Free Web Site - Free Web Space and Site Hosting - Web Hosting - Internet Store and Ecommerce Solution Provider - High Speed Internet
Search the Web

In Education: Big Is Not Better - Research Finds Small Schools Better for Poor and Black Students

Welcome to Citizens for Better Schools WHAT'S NEW: Ala Ed Budget Crisis - State Takes Fed Stimulus Funds Then Cuts State Funding REGISTRATION NOW OPEN: Brown Past 50 SympoSIUM and Education Workshops SCHOOL TAKEOVER CORNER: BIRMINGHAM * DETROIT * SAINT LOUIS School Size and Grade Structure Contact Citizens for Better Schools Education Statistics & Thumbnail Facts: School size not saving Detroit schools form chopping blocks - Economies of scale B'ham Superintendent Search: Edgecombe County - Birmingham City Schools NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND REAUTHORIZATION UPDATE PAGE - NOW OPEN BIRMINGHAM SCHOOL CLOSING WATCH: MORE SECRET MEETINGS 2007-2008 BIRMINGHAM SCHOOL CLOSINGS (HERE WE GO AGAIN - "DOWN SIZING, RIGHT SIZING, or CAPSIZING" ) Alabama School Districts Without One Month Reserve Fund More Busing in Birmingham With School Consolidations ALA'S #1 PROBLEM: TEACHER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT Blog Ala's Biggest Problem - Teacher Sexual Misconduct BIG SPENDERS - MOST COSTLY SCHOOLS NOT SMALL SCHOOLS The late Henry Sparks made Birmingham the financial envy of the state's education system Education Finance, Economics, & Budget Monitoring Despite Free Space in SomeSchools, Many Packed Classrooms(How are Birmingham Classrooms?) Class Size Comparison Changes For Parents - The Classroom Effects of Closing & Consolidating Schools COMING SOON: ** THE CHOICE: SCHOOL ZONING, BIG SCHOOLS - SMALL SCHOOLS (WHICH EDUCATES THE POOR BEST?) CLASS SIZE REDUCTION Education Research on School Size: School Climate and Academic Achievement Evidence Based Consequences of Increased School Size Curriculum and Instruction  BIRMINGHAM CITY SCHOOLS DECLINE: THEFT IN SCHOLS - INTERNAL CONTROLS LACKING Worhtless BOE Guidelines and Frame Work For Superintendent Stan Mims, Lay Citizen Advisory Task Force (BOE Policy 6170) Sabotaged In Education: Big Is Not Better - Research Finds Small Schools Better for Poor and Black Students Links About Birmingham City Schools The Good Common School Journal Thumbnail Facts: Birmingham Enrollment/ Teacher Loss Not Cause of $22 Million Bham BOE Losses Anniston Citizens for Better Schools FAIRFIELD CITIZENS FOR BETTER SCHOOLS Jefferson County (Alabama) School System: Sylacauga Citizens for Better Schools Citizens For Better Schools: Education Management and Leadership Special, Exceptional, and Gifted and Talented Education GOLD FACULTY - BROWN PAST 50 WORKSHOP: BEYOND NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND - FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF BROWN Contact Your School, State, and Federal Representation Here! Favorite Links: Legal Resources - College Funding Opportunity ALL SPORTS Birmingham - ALL THE TIME GENDER EQUITY: Public Schools, Segregated Schools? Phillips Academy - Crisis in Student School Bus Transportation WE ARE "HOKIES" TOO! Topic Index: BREAKING SCHOOL CLOSING NEWS ** Citizens for Better Schools Guest Book

Bank Street
spacer.gif:   Search  spacer.gif:  Site Index spacer.gif:  Webmail spacer.gif:  Contact Us  spacer.gif:  Home spacer.gif:
spacer.gif:
headerLeft.gif: headerRight.gif:
spacer.gif:
spacer.gif:

 

 

spacer.gif: spacer.gif:

 

Small Schools Offer Real Hope for Communities of Color

America's urban high schools are struggling

(As appeared in Education Update December 2001)

by Dr. Augusta Souza Kappner

Not long ago, I traveled to Seattle to join a group of multicultural scholars and practitioners and the nation's leading small schools (K-12) scholars. We were meeting to discuss the potential benefits of small schools reform for minority communities. On at least one point we were unanimous: for urban centers and communities of color, most high schools are failing.

The news out of our high schools is bleak: -High dropout rates continue to plague communities of color. -African-American and Latino students are retained (required to repeat a grade) at alarming rates. -Students of color continue to trail their peers on achievement indicators.

Leaders, both within and outside minority communities, have been searching desperately for answers. But surprisingly - at least from my perspective - few have embraced a strategy that offers a tremendous amount of promise: small schools reform.

Small schools work. And they appear to work particularly well with disadvantaged students. Last year, Bank Street College of Education's study, Small Schools: Great Strides, chronicled the success of small schools reform in numerous Chicago public schools. The average school size nationwide is 741 students, and it is not uncommon for urban children to attend elementary schools with more than 1,000 students and high schools with 3,000 students. By contrast, small schools in the Bank Street study enrolled between 200 to 400 students. The difference between the small schools we examined and their larger counterparts was striking.

We found that smaller learning communities diminish school violence, raise academic engagement and performance, and increase attendance and graduation rates - the very issues with which minority communities across the nation are grappling. Our research affirms the mounting mass of evidence of those who have studied small schools over the past decade. Most promising, small schools reform works within a public school framework - an important fact for leaders of color given that approximately 95% of African American and 91% of Latino students currently attend public schools.

Why are there not more leaders from communities of color championing small schools efforts? Why do we allow communities to continue to build the sort of gigantic schools that breed alienation and low expectations? I believe that information about the value of small schools has simply not reached a broad enough audience. A just-released survey from Public Agenda confirms that the majority of America's parents and teachers do not place school size high on their lists of educational concerns. Small school reformers are now recognizing the need to reach out to leaders in communities of color and welcome them into small schools efforts.

I recognize the honest concerns some have about small schools. Many fear small schools may be prohibitively expensive. Some others - many from African American or other underserved communities - worry that overly sympathetic teachers in highly personalized learning environments, in recognizing the disadvantages faced by their students, may not hold students to sufficiently high standards of achievement.

The evidence gives us confidence that these concerns can be surmounted by a thoughtful, coherent and diligent approach to the creation of small schools. We have seen that small schools can be affordable for even the poorest communities. (Research by Fruchter, Stiefel et al. shows that the cost per graduate is actually lower in small schools than in large.) We have found that most small schools hold high expectations for their students. Small school populations, like large school populations, generally reflect the ethnic makeup of the communities they serve; where integration is the goal, small schools are often more likely to be able to achieve diverse populations. In systems that establish clear, progressive guidelines, small schools are actually less likely to be segregated than are larger schools.

Interestingly, some minority leaders have recently spoken out in favor of charter schools and voucher plans. Their explanation has been not so much an embrace of these strategies as a rejection of the status quo. The frustration they feel with the ongoing failure of our urban public schools to adequately serve students of color is certainly understandable. But what is needed now is not an abandonment of public schools but rather a commitment to establishing more effective - and smaller - learning communities.

Leaders of color should endorse the small schools movement - within public school systems - because small schools offer the potential for quality education, provide educational opportunities, and foster academic and social success. Small schools may well provide an answer to much of what ails today's most difficult-to-reform educational systems. Consequently, now is the time for leaders of color to propel this movement forward.

BEYOND FINANCE ADEQUACY: EQUITY & EQUALITY

Mayor Bloomberg Seeks Further Changes for City Schools

Andrea Mohin/The New York Times

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg just before he delivered his speech to the City Council. He called for further overhaul of the schools.

Published: January 18, 2007

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg laid out ambitious new plans yesterday to overhaul the school system by giving principals more power and autonomy, requiring teachers to undergo rigorous review in order to gain tenure and revising the school financing system that has allowed more-experienced teachers to cluster in affluent areas.

The plan, which would also increase the role of private groups, represents the most sweeping changes to the system since the mayor reorganized it after gaining control of the schools in 2002. Although the mayor has chosen to spend some of the city’s current surplus on tax cuts, he said he could invest more in schools with money promised by Gov. Eliot Spitzer to equalize state education aid across New York.

The administration can undertake most of the education measures unilaterally, without City Council or union acquiescence.

Mr. Bloomberg presented the plans with great fanfare in his annual State of the City speech, which he gave this year at the New York City College of Technology, in Brooklyn.

In the midst of his second and final term, Mr. Bloomberg also offered a raft of new proposals, including curtailing labor costs by forcing the city’s unions to negotiate pension benefits as part of the collective bargaining process.

Responding to an increase in complaints against the police, and as the outcry over the fatal police shooting of Sean Bell has continued, Mr. Bloomberg said he would provide more money for the Civilian Complaint Review Board, which investigates reports of police abuses. And he called for reforming the “pay-to-play” culture of government by banning political contributions from people who do business with the city.

But in a speech packed with new antipoverty, criminal justice and tax-cutting measures, including reducing property taxes and eliminating the sales tax on clothing, the mayor’s focus on education was the most far-reaching and politically contentious element. This time, he seems intent on carrying out structural changes that his aides said would address inequities that they maintain are at the heart of troubled schools, particularly the imbalance in the quality of teaching and administration between schools in rich and poor neighborhoods.

“During our first term, we brought stability, accountability and standards to a school system where they were sorely lacking,” Mr. Bloomberg said. “With this strong foundation now laid, we can take the next steps forward, creating great schools where all students can succeed.”

Randi Weingarten, the president of the United Federation of Teachers, raised concerns about the mayor’s tenure proposal, calling it “a vital protection for teachers to be able to do their job.” She also said the mayor should focus more on reducing class size and giving teachers more latitude on instruction.

The proposals would overhaul the present system of near-automatic tenure for teachers after three years; requiring them to be more rigorously evaluated and actually recommended for tenure by principals.

At the same time, the administration is moving to extend the “empowerment school” concept across the system, eliminating the 10 regional offices and making principals far more responsible for hiring, teacher training, curriculum and budgets.

In keeping with the focus on accountability, Mr. Bloomberg said, principals will also be evaluated more thoroughly, with public letter-graded reports based largely on their students’ annual standardized test scores.

Finally, Mr. Bloomberg’s plan includes changing the way money is distributed to schools, to ensure that funds are based on the number of students and their particular needs, to close gaps in per-student spending in different schools that can run as high as $2,000 per child, he said. Under current procedures, each school is given enough money to cover the salaries of all its teachers . If a school has many long-time teachers, who earn more, its per-pupil spending is greater.

In doing so, Bloomberg administration officials said, the intent was to make the system fairer and to help improve schools that often lack resources and to allow administrators to use those resources as they see fit. The shift is partly designed to help schools that serve large numbers of poor students to attract more experienced and highly paid teachers who often gravitate to affluent areas.

As if to pre-empt concerns in neighborhoods like the Upper West Side and Park Slope, where some schools have high payrolls, Mr. Bloomberg said that the administration would take the new approach “flexibly, and phase it in over time to make sure that important programs we have now and services for our kids that we have are not jeopardized.”

Next Page »

Al Baker and David M. Herszenhorn contributed reporting.

Tips

To find reference information about the words used in this article, hold down the ALT key and click on any word, phrase or name. A new window will open with a dictionary definition or encyclopedia entry.

Related Articles